Boycott Modi
Boycott Modi |
The opposition is demanding that Modi should be present during discussions about violence against women in Manipur. What the opposition if failing to realize is the fact that Modi is not a capable leader to face failure and distress. The opposition thinks that Modi is the Prime minister of India, which is not true. Modi is a person who holds that post for prestige, power and for boasting about stuff to others. Other than that maybe he is worth enough to eat cow dung and drink cow urine. That’s it.
Think of great leaders, Alexander led battles, charged into enemy when things were bleak, he was leader. He did not charge in only when he knew victory was imminent, there are many accounts where he led by his bravery and courage during the darkest hour. That’s bravery.
Think of Nehru, he did not write apology letter to British when he was in jail begging his release. He faced their batons, faced possible extermination and stood up as a leader. He stood up in Parliament when India lost to China in 1962, faced criticisms like his balled head should be cut off and given to the Chinese. He withstood it. That’s a mark of a great leader. In-fact he was called the light of humanity for his great soul.
Here we have got this “Prime Minister” Modi who can’t even face journalist bravely, my question is, knowing that he is coward and incapable, why the opposition wants him in the parliament floor? Let that idiot go to some country and boast India is this great thing and that great thing, we should not care about him. I wish the opposition seeks facts from the government (which can function better without Modi), and makes sure that the women who were raped, paraded naked in their villages gets the right retribution and justice.
You can’t expect a good action or good thought from a rotting corpse, its foolish, so let’s leave the corpse and see how we can soothe the wounds of the people Manipur with the help of people who are alive and have soul of a human in them, and let’s possibly liberate the nation from religious rule and form a rationalist state.